Data sheet Revised

Program & Engineering Leadership

Interim engineering management, distributed team leadership and measurable process improvement, for programs that have drifted and teams that need a leader who has done the work.

Standards
The program's own: DO-178C, DO-297, ARP4754B and ARP4761A practised directly
Assurance
Programs up to Design Assurance Level (DAL) A
When to call us
When schedule or technical confidence has drifted, or when a team needs an interim lead
Delivery
Remote or on-site; offsite and nearshore teams led before

Scope

Programs stall for management reasons as often as for technical ones.

We take on interim engineering management roles: leading offsite and nearshore engineering teams, owning program risk registers, and restoring schedule and technical confidence when a program has drifted. The work is hands-on process improvement as much as management: streamlining requirements and configuration-management workflows, removing rework loops, and instituting the review discipline that catches defects earlier. On past programs this kind of work has delivered productivity gains of 30 % or more without adding headcount.

The goal is organizational change that survives our departure: teams that keep the improved cadence and discipline after the engagement ends, not a dependency on continued outside leadership.

Deliverables

What the program has when we leave.

Document What it is When
Risk register Owned, current and read with the schedule, not a list of nouns From week one
Status Honest schedule and technical status, with no surprises about risk or certification exposure Ongoing
Workflows Requirements and configuration-management workflows streamlined, rework loops removed During the engagement
Review discipline Reviews that catch defects earlier, instituted and measured During the engagement
Handover A team that keeps the cadence after we leave; [handover deliverable name] At the end

From drift to cadence

Four stages of an interim engagement.

  1. 01 Assess Where the program actually is: the risk register, the open problems, the gap between the plan and the practice.
  2. 02 Stabilize Schedule and technical confidence restored, with status the applicant and the authority can rely on.
  3. 03 Improve Rework loops removed, workflows streamlined, review discipline instituted and measured.
  4. 04 Hand over The cadence and the discipline stay with the team; the dependency on outside leadership does not.

The record

Four kinds of program, led.

  • Turbine engine control Design Assurance Level A software development and certification for leading engine manufacturers, on turbofan, turboshaft and turboprop programs.
  • Satellite and LEO payloads Payload software program leadership for satellite and low-earth-orbit constellations.
  • Safety-critical avionics Leadership of verification and validation teams.
  • Engineering organizations Director-level engineering management and business development.

Field notes